I was working with a trigonometry student on trigonometric
identities. He was expecting his teacher to announce a test or a quiz soon, and
he was still uncomfortable with the topic.
“I just don’t feel like I know the steps,” he told me. I’m afraid he
found my response unsatisfactory: “There
aren’t any steps. You just have to play with it. You’ll have to come to terms
with that.”
When I’m tutoring and a student pulls out a question, I
usually know the steps. However, occasionally I have to say, “I don’t immediately
see how to do this one. Give me a minute and let me play with it.” I have come
to realize that letting them watch me solve a problem while I think out loud
(formally known as “modeling problem-solving behavior”) is actually more
educational than teaching them steps. They would not agree. They want a recipe,
dang it, and any delay in getting there is just wasting time.
I recently learned that in Russia as early as 1st
grade (or rather the Russian equivalent of 1st grade) the schools
distinguish between “problems” and “exercises.” An exercise is a question that
one answers using an algorithm. The question was usually assigned specifically
to allow the student to practice a particular algorithm. A problem, on the
other hand, is a question that one does not initially know how to approach.
What may be a problem for some students may be an exercise for older, more
experienced students.
I have decided to begin distinguishing between problems and
exercises when I talk about them. Old habits die hard and I imagine I will need
to correct myself often at first. However, the trouble with schooling is that
there are too many exercises and not enough problems. I think the first step
towards addressing this issue is to point out the difference.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.